引用本文:张贵金,杨松林.深埋大直径无压引水隧洞基于流变的风险分析[J].水利水运工程学报,2005,(1):15-22
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 738次   下载 0 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
深埋大直径无压引水隧洞基于流变的风险分析
张贵金1,杨松林2
1. 长沙理工大学,河海工程学院,湖南,长沙,410076
2. 五凌电力有限公司,湖南,长沙,410076
摘要:
以南水北调西线工程深埋大直径无压引水隧洞为例,考虑高地应力及锚杆、衬砌等支护的动态作用,推导出隧洞围岩、衬砌应力及位移的表达式.经计算表明,一般在运行5年后,隧洞衬砌及围岩稳定破坏基于流变的风险达到最大,并随围岩流变的稳定而趋于稳定,隧洞开挖后未及时衬砌的风险明显高于及时衬砌的情况.
关键词:  引水隧洞 隧洞衬砌 隧洞开挖 南水北调西线工程 围岩 流变 风险分析 大直径 支护 位移
DOI:
分类号:TV672.1 TV554
基金项目:教育部科学技术研究重点项目资助(01099)
Risk analysis of deep-buried free-flow large-diameter tunnel based on surrounding rock rheology
ZHANG Gui-jin1,YANG Song-lin2
Abstract:
Taking the deep buried free-flow large-diameter tunnel of the West Route Project of the South-North Water Transfer Project as an example, the expressions of stresses and displacement of the surrounding rock and liner are deduced considering the high-geostresses and the dynamic actions of the anchor rod and liner. Calculation results show that the stability failure risk based on the rheologic values of the tunnel liner and surrounding rock reaches the maximum after five years, and becomes more stable with the rehologic stability of the surrounding rock. The risk of a tunnel without liner in time is much higher than that with liner.
Key words:  concrete liner,rock rheology,deep-buried tunnel,risk analysis
手机扫一扫看